How Plants Become Bushy, or Not
New study sheds light on the hormone that controls how a plant branches
For many plants, more branches means more fruit. But how does a plant branch or not branch? New research from the Department of Plant Biology has shown how plants break down the hormone strigolactone, which suppresses branching, to become more “bushy.” Using a combination of structural biology, biochemistry, and genetic engineering, the team confirmed the specific enzymes responsible for dismantling strigolactone, and their mechanism. Understanding how strigolactone is regulated could have big implications for many crop plants. The study was published August 1 in Nature Communications.
“Being able to manipulate strigolactone could also have implications beyond plant architecture, including on a plant’s resilience to drought and pathogens,” said senior author Nitzan Shabek, an associate professor of plant biology who specializes in biochemistry and structural biology.
Strigolactone’s hormonal role was only discovered in 2008, and Shabek describes it as “the new kid on the block” for plant hormone research. In addition to regulating branching behavior, strigolactone also promotes beneficial belowground interactions between mycorrhizal fungi and plant roots, and helps plants respond to stresses such as drought and high salinity.
Though scientists know a lot about how plants synthesize strigolactones and other hormones, very little is known about how plants break them down. Recent research has suggested that enzymes called “carboxylesterases”, which exist in all kingdoms of life, including humans, might be involved in degrading strigolactone. Plants produce more than twenty types of carboxylesterases, but only two forms in particular, CXE15 and CX20, have been linked to strigolactone. However, this link was only speculative, and Shabek’s team wanted to know more about how this degradation works.
“Our lab is interested in mechanisms, meaning we don’t want to just know that a car can drive, we want to know how it's driving; what's going on inside the engine,” said Shabek.
Deciphering an enzyme’s engine
To investigate whether CXE15 and CX20 really are involved in strigolactone regulation, the researchers began by building 3D models of the enzymes’ molecular structure. This work was kickstarted by undergraduate researcher Linyi Yan, who grew and purified the carboxylesterase proteins in the lab.
That student-led project very quickly became “something bigger,” said Shabek.
Then, postdoctoral fellow Malathy Palayam used x-ray crystallography and computer simulations to solve the enzymes’ three-dimensional atomic structure, and performed biochemical experiments to compare how (and how well) the two enzymes might degrade the hormone.
These experiments showed that CXE15 was much more efficient at breaking down strigolactone than CXE20, which binds to strigolactone but doesn’t degrade it effectively. Their 3D models revealed something new: that a specific region of CXE15 actually allowed the enzyme to change its shape.
“CXE15 is a very effective enzyme—it can completely destroy the strigolactone molecule in milliseconds,” said Shabek. “When we zoomed in, we realized that there is a dynamic area in the enzyme’s structure which is required for it to function in this way.”
The team’s analyses showed that that CXE15 (teal) is much more efficient at breaking-down strigolactone, and this difference is due to a dynamic region on one end of the enzyme (shown in pink) that helps it latch on to its hormone target (beige). For CXE20 (purple), the corresponding dynamic region is shown in green. Whereas CXE15 can dismantle strigolactone in milliseconds, CXE20 binds to strigolactone but doesn’t degrade it effectively. (Shabek Lab / UC Davis).
A surprisingly dynamic enzyme
By examining CXE15’s structure, Shabek and his collaborators identified specific amino acids that allow the enzyme to dynamically bind to strigolactone. Then, to confirm that these amino acids were indeed responsible for the enzyme’s efficiency, they genetically engineered a mutant version of the enzyme with an altered dynamic region. The mutant version showed a reduced capacity to degrade strigolactone both in vitro and when the team tested it in Nicotiana benthamiana plants.
Shabek says the next steps will be to investigate how carboxylesterase enzymes are produced in different plant tissues, like roots and stems.
“In this study we were really interested in elucidating these enzymes’ mechanism and structure, but future studies can begin investigating how they affect plant growth and development,” said Shabek.
Additional authors on the study are: Ugrappa Nagalakshmi, Amelia K. Gilio, and Savithramma Dinesh-Kumar, UC Davis; and David Cornu and Francois-Didier Boyer, Universite Paris-Saclay.
The work was supported by the National Science Foundation, and the U.S. Department of Energy.
Media Resources
- Liana Wait is a freelance science writer based in Philadelphia. She has a Ph.D. in ecology and evolutionary biology and specializes in writing about the life sciences.
- Nitzan Shabek, Plant Biology, nshabek@ucdavis.edu